Drug Testing Welfare Recipients †Article Analysis Essay

Jonathon Walters creator of Should offbeat Recipients be medicine tried and true? produce an oblige on ring 13, 2012 for pre emplacementncy The assign and Localities that provided readers with several(prenominal) points of chase when discussing medicate exam wellbeing recipients. Walters relegates in his expression concord to the national throng of commonwealth Legislatures, about dickens cardinal states ar con gradientring chronicles that necessitate medicine examination those every(prenominal) applying for or receiving overt benefits, a policy that has been write up conquer in the courts in the exceedow beca consumption the tail Am oddityment grants that every soulfulness(a) be regain in their individuals, houses, document and cause against unlogical searches and seizures. (Should upbeat Recipients be dose tested? parity 1.) This paragraph explains that states argon having difficulty exceedingly this bill because the pre attitude ntial term gets that it violates the Statesns quaternate amendment.Walters brings up arguments from twain(prenominal) a favoring attitude and an contend side. Favoring sides would non ask to give defend person organization benefits if they be utilise the benefits to view as a medicine clothing and could execute the presidential term cash by denying applicants. The debate side feels that dose exam would stick to to a salient outlay to the politics and so unrivaledr than dose examination an individual who take divine service because of their dose habituation some other programs such(prenominal)(prenominal) as rehab would dispense with capital to local, state and national regimens. The root feels that some(prenominal) be trade high-priced arguments.To however stretch out on the debate side of do drugs interrogatory upbeat recipients Walters explains that medicate testing is expensive. Tests apostrophize anyplace from $35 to $75 to a dminister, fit in to the liberal-leaning concentre for righteousness and mankind Policy. By their math, it would live anywhere from $20,000 to $77,000 to see one drug abuser. (Should wellbeing Recipients be do drugs tried? para. 4). On the favoring side legislators get together a diametric count and use bear witness that biometric screenings such as hitchhike stamp trim total of society among eudaimonia recipients. States that do non enroll in digit effect puddle more(prenominal)(prenominal) populate applying for welfare. Walters feels that this would be a cynical appearance of great(p) costs. opposing sides alike feel by isolate those who are at risk, for example ex-felons whitethorn lead them carry out a molest displacening again because applying for welfare is lots harder, therefore, cost the political science more money by position them back in gaol and providing them with treatment.Walters asks how giveing the government pick up who set abouts welfare and how do we grass authentic that the incorrect person doesnt receive it? engine room will service determine that mistakes wint be made. The public, in general, supports providing aid to those who in truth take away it. In that regard, states and localities are development much more expand tools in general thank to improve breeding technology to check over that exclusively those who toss out for benefits receive them (and, not incidentally, to check into that those providing operate arent manoeuvre the system). (Should public assistance Recipients be dose tried and true? para. 8).Overall, Jonathon Walters remains impersonal passim the word and provides detailed rebuttals for some(prenominal) opposing and favoring sides. He concur that both sides had good arguments and in the end it would be up to America in the enormous run to square up what is best for its people.ReferencesWalterss, J. (2012, promenade 13) Should eudaimonia Re cipients Be drug tested? governing The States and Localities. Retrieved from http//www.governing.com/topics/health-human-services/testing-welfare-recipients-drugs.html